Report 2016-136 Recommendation 6 Responses

Report 2016-136: School Violence Prevention: School Districts, County Offices of Education, and the State Must Do More to Ensure That School Safety Plans Help Protect Students and Staff During Emergencies (Release Date: August 2017)

Recommendation #6 To: Education, Department of

To ensure that districts and county offices properly review and approve safety plans as required, CDE should provide additional guidance regarding district and county office responsibilities under state law by providing general direction to schools on what to include in their building disaster plans.

Agency Response*

CDE explored options to collaborate with other agencies to strengthen the general direction already provided for schools disaster building plans.

The CDE Coordinated School Health and Safety Office met internally with the School Facilities and Transportation Services Division to discuss building disaster plan concepts. In addition, CDE reached out to various entities, which provided the following expertise and input: (1) Cal OES - Staff agreed with CDE's interpretation regarding building disaster plans representing evacuation plans (EC 32282(B) Disaster procedures, routine and emergency, including adaptations for pupils with disabilities in accordance with the federal ADA of 1990). Cal OES also indicated that state buildings have evacuation plans but not building disaster plans; and (2) DGS - The office building manager provided their annually updated Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) to CDE. General elements of the EOP are consistent with those required by EC section 32282, and include calling for disaster procedures (routine and emergency), a crisis response plan (often called EOP), including adaptations for pupils with disabilities, and procedures for safe ingress and egress of pupils, parents, and employees to and from school sites. DGS' EOP Table of Contents specifies types of emergency situations and procedures that will serve as suggestions to LEAs developing building disaster plans. They include fire, relocation/evacuation, bomb threat, bioterrorism/hazardous materials, earthquake, flood, power failure/blackout, intruders/solicitors, weapons/assault/hostage, explosion/gas/fumes, and medical illness or injury.

CDE is updating the compliance checklist for a comprehensive school safety plan to include items, as suggested by the agencies contacted, for inclusion in the required building disaster plan. In addition, these items will be included in the CDE's annual reminder to LEAs regarding updating and approving school safety plans by March 1, 2018.

  • Response Type†: 60-Day
  • Response Date: November 2017

California State Auditor's Assessment of Status: Pending

CDE is updating is compliance checklist to include items, as suggested by the Cal OES and DGS, for inclusion in the required building disaster plan. In addition, these items will be included in CDE's annual reminder to LEAs regarding updating and approving school safety plans by March 1, 2018.


All Recommendations in 2016-136

†Response Type refers to the interval in which the auditee is providing the State Auditor with their status in implementing recommendations made in an audit report. Auditees must submit a response regarding their progress in implementing recommendations from our reports at three intervals from the release of the report: 60 days, six months, and one year or subsequent to one year.

*Agency responses received after June 2013 are posted verbatim.


Report type

Report type
















© 2013, California State Auditor | Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Download Adobe PDF Reader