Report 2009-103 Recommendation 3 Responses

Report 2009-103: Departments of Health Care Services and Public Health: Their Actions Reveal Flaws in the State's Oversight of the California Constitution's Implied Civil Service Mandate and in the Departments' Contracting for Information Technology Services (Release Date: September 2009)

Recommendation #3 To: Public Health, Department of

To promote fairness and to obtain the best value for the State, Public Health should demonstrate its compliance with General Services' policies and procedures. Specifically, in its requests for offer, it should provide potential suppliers with the criteria and points that it will use to evaluate their offers.

Agency Response*

As previously reported, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) issued Contract Bulletin 11-07 dated December 1, 2011, requiring CDPH programs to use a request for offer (RFO) template for procurement of services via Department of General Services approved Leverage Procurement Agreements, i.e. California Multiple Award Schedules and Master Service Agreements.

To ensure compliance, the CDPH Program Support Branch, Contract and Purchasing Services Section (CPSS) reviews RFOs developed by programs prior to putting the RFO out to bid. If CPSS determined a program had not appropriately used the RFO template, CPSS required the program to rewrite, or in rare occasions, rebid the required services with the correct template.

Since January 2013, CPSS issued six purchase orders using the RFO template.

  • Response Type†: Annual Follow Up
  • Completion Date: December 2011
  • Response Date: October 2013

California State Auditor's Assessment of Status: Fully Implemented


Agency Response*

We issued Contracts and Purchasing Section (CPSS) Bulletin No. 11-07 on December 1, 2011 which provided instructions to our programs to use a request for offer template. See attached document.

  • Response Type†: Annual Follow Up
  • Response Date: September 2012

California State Auditor's Assessment of Status: Not Fully Implemented

  • Auditee did not substantiate its claim of full implementation

All Recommendations in 2009-103

†Response Type refers to the interval in which the auditee is providing the State Auditor with their status in implementing recommendations made in an audit report. Auditees must submit a response regarding their progress in implementing recommendations from our reports at three intervals from the release of the report: 60 days, six months, and one year or subsequent to one year.

*Agency responses received after June 2013 are posted verbatim.


Report type

Report type
















© 2013, California State Auditor | Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Download Adobe PDF Reader