Report 2008-112 Recommendation 2 Responses

Report 2008-112: Electronic Waste: Some State Agencies Have Discarded Their Electronic Waste Improperly, While State and Local Oversight Is Limited (Release Date: November 2008)

Recommendation #2 To: Justice, Department of

To avoid contaminating the environment through the inappropriate discarding of electronic devices, state agencies should ascertain whether the electronic devices that require disposal can go into the trash. Alternatively, state agencies could treat all electronic devices they wish to discard as universal waste and recycle them.

Agency Response*

It has always been the department's policy to properly dispose of unwanted or damaged equipment. In April 2010, the department's policy was revised and more clearly outlines what we consider to be e-waste and how it should be disposed of. A copy of this policy from the department's Administrative Manual (sections 11262 and 11263) is attached for your reference. As with all administrative policies, there is an ongoing effort to ensure education and compliance, especially with staff turnover. The department Property Controller actively works with the field property custodians throughout the state to help them identify an appropriate means of disposal for all surveyed equipment. (See 2010-041, p. 151)

  • Response Type†: Annual Follow Up
  • Response Date: January 2011

California State Auditor's Assessment of Status: Fully Implemented


Agency Response*

Justice stated that it continues to educate staff regarding the proper disposal of all waste and surplus items, including e-waste. It also stated that it is still in the process of revising its property control manual that will further emphasize the proper disposal and documentation of all assets. Justice indicated that conflicting priorities and staff shortages have delayed completion of this manual until February 2010. (See 2010-406, p. 98)

  • Response Type†: 1-Year
  • Response Date: December 2009

California State Auditor's Assessment of Status: Partially Implemented


All Recommendations in 2008-112

†Response Type refers to the interval in which the auditee is providing the State Auditor with their status in implementing recommendations made in an audit report. Auditees must submit a response regarding their progress in implementing recommendations from our reports at three intervals from the release of the report: 60 days, six months, and one year or subsequent to one year.

*Agency responses received after June 2013 are posted verbatim.


Report type

Report type
















© 2013, California State Auditor | Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Download Adobe PDF Reader