Report 2019-116 Recommendation 15 Responses

Report 2019-116: Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act: Weak Oversight Has Hindered Its Meaningful Implementation (Release Date: May 2020)

Recommendation #15 To: Los Angeles County Probation Department

To accurately assess the effectiveness of its programs, Los Angeles should determine how to accurately identify in its case management system the JJCPA programs and services in which each individual participates or should enhance its system to provide this capability.

Annual Follow-Up Agency Response From September 2023

As mentioned in our response submitted on 10/8/2021 and in the Fall of 2022, the County of Los Angeles Probation Department's case management system is designed to track Probation youth case information only as models are designed to meet other criteria. The County consulted with the JJCPA evaluator to develop a process to track JJCPA funded services for Probation youth in our case management system. Probation has finalized the process of making enhancements to our case management system to include specific JJCPA funded program and services tracking capability. After the first quarter post implementation, Probation will continue to work with the JJCPA evaluator to verify program/service tracking implementation and submit an updated response, with this verification, prior to the next annual response due date for this Recommendation..

California State Auditor's Assessment of Annual Follow-Up Status: Pending


Annual Follow-Up Agency Response From December 2022

As mentioned in our response submitted on 10/8/2021, the County of Los Angeles Probation Department's case management system is designed to track Probation youth case information only as models are designed to meet other criteria. The County consulted with the JJCPA evaluator to develop a process to track JJCPA funded services for Probation youth in our case management system. Probation is in the process of finalizing these enhancements for our case management system to include specific JJCPA funded program and services tracking capability. Once this process is completed and prior to the next annual response due date, Probation will provide an updated response to this Recommendation.

California State Auditor's Assessment of Annual Follow-Up Status: Pending


Annual Follow-Up Agency Response From October 2021

As mentioned in our 1-Year response (submitted 5/12/2021), the County of Los Angeles Probation Department's case management system is designed to track Probation youth case information only as models are designed to meet other criteria. The County consulted with our JJCPA evaluator to develop a draft process to track JJCPA funded services for Probation youth in our case management system; implementation is targeted for potential preliminary review by our JJCPA evaluator prior to the next 1-Year audit response due date of Fall 2022.

California State Auditor's Assessment of Annual Follow-Up Status: Pending


1-Year Agency Response

As mentioned in our 6-Month response, the County of Los Angeles Probation Department's case management system is designed to track Probation youth case information only as models are designed to meet other criteria. We continue with the process of seeking ways to upgrade our case management system to meet the evolving needs of data collection and evaluation. It is anticipated that our previous target completion date remains in place and will be reported by the next 1 Year audit response due May 12, 2022.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Pending


6-Month Agency Response

As mentioned in our 60-Day response, the County of Los Angeles Probation Department's case management system is designed to track Probation youth case information only as models are designed to meet other criteria. We are in the process of seeking ways to upgrade our case management system to meet the evolving needs of data collection and evaluation.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Pending


60-Day Agency Response

The County of Los Angeles Probation Department's case management system is designed to track Probation youth case information only and is not designed for non-Probation youth or all participant information as models are designed to meet other criteria. Therefore, all program participation cannot be captured in the current system as designed. We will continue to seek ways to upgrade Probation's case management system to meet the evolving needs of data collection and evaluation.

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending


All Recommendations in 2019-116

Agency responses received are posted verbatim.